Algae And Protists Codexery

Chromista

Proposed kingdom of eukaryotes with chlorophyll c plastids.

Chromista is a proposed biological kingdom, one that remains controversial, and was refined from the earlier grouping Chromalveolata. It includes both single-celled and multicellular eukaryotic species linked by shared features in their photosynthetic organelles, or plastids. Specifically, it covers all eukaryotes whose plastids contain chlorophyll c and are enclosed by four membranes. If the common ancestor of this group already had chloroplasts obtained through endosymbiosis from red algae, then any non-photosynthetic members of Chromista must have secondarily lost the ability to photosynthesize. It is also possible that its members arose independently from the last eukaryotic common ancestor, forming separate evolutionary lines.

The kingdom was created in 1981 by British biologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith to separate the stramenopiles, haptophytes, and cryptophytes. Initially, it consisted mostly of photosynthetic algae, but Cavalier-Smith later added many heterotrophic protozoa. By 2022, the kingdom was nearly as diverse as Plantae and Animalia, containing nine phyla. Notable members include marine algae, the organism behind potato blight, dinoflagellates, *Paramecium*, the brain parasite *Toxoplasma*, and the malaria parasite *Plasmodium*.

However, many researchers reject Cavalier-Smith’s idea that chromists form a single, natural group (monophyly). Instead, they think some chromists acquired their plastids by engulfing another chromist, rather than inheriting them from a common ancestor. This process likely happened repeatedly, spreading red plastids from one group to another. As a result, the plastids—far from marking their hosts as a single clade—have a history separate from their diverse hosts. They appear to have originated in the Rhodophytina, then passed to the Cryptophytina, from there to both the Ochrophyta and the Haptophyta, and finally from the Haptophyta to the Myzozoa.

**Biology**

Members of Chromista are single-celled or multicellular eukaryotes that typically have one or both of these features: plastids containing chlorophyll c, located within an extra membrane (the periplastid membrane) in the lumen of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (often within the perinuclear cisterna); and cilia with rigid tubular hairs that are either tripartite or bipartite. The group includes a wide range of organisms, from algae to malarial parasites. Molecular evidence suggests that chromist plastids came from red algae through a single secondary symbiogenesis event—unlike plants, which got their plastids directly from cyanobacteria via primary symbiogenesis. These plastids are now wrapped in two extra cell membranes, forming a four-membrane envelope, which required the acquisition of many membrane proteins to transport molecules in and out. The diversity of chromists is thought to have arisen from the degeneration, loss, or replacement of plastids in some lineages. Additional symbiogenesis involving green algae provided genes retained in some members (such as heterokonts), and bacterial chlorophyll (indicated by the presence of the ribosomal protein L36 gene, *rpl36*) appears in haptophytes and cryptophytes.

**History and groups**

The groups involved have overlapping but not identical memberships, as shown in various classification schemes.

The Chromophycées (Chadefaud, 1950), later renamed Chromophycota (Chadefaud, 1960), included the current Ochrophyta (autotrophic Stramenopiles), Haptophyta (then part of Chrysophyceae until 1962), Cryptophyta, Dinophyta, Euglenophyceae, and Choanoflagellida (then part of Chrysophyceae until 1975).

The Chromophyta (Christensen, 1962 and 1989), defined as algae with chlorophyll c, included the current Ochrophyta, Haptophyta, Cryptophyta, Dinophyta, and Choanoflagellida, while Euglenophyceae were moved to Chlorophyta.

Another Chromophyta (Bourrelly, 1968) included the current Ochrophyta, Haptophyta, and Choanoflagellida, with Cryptophyceae and Dinophyceae placed in Pyrrhophyta (= Dinophyta).

Cavalier-Smith first introduced the name Chromista in 1981. The term Chromophyta (or Chromobiota) corresponds to non-cryptophyte chromists. It includes all protists whose plastids contain chlorophyll c and was described as having three groups: Heterokonts (or Stramenopiles: brown algae, diatoms, water moulds, etc.), Haptophytes, and Cryptomonads. In 1994, Cavalier-Smith and colleagues suggested Chromista is probably polyphyletic—its members arose independently, sharing only descent from the common ancestor of all eukaryotes. They noted that the four phyla containing chromophyte algae (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta, Dinozoa) are distantly related, and that photosynthetic taxa within each phylum radiated much later than the phyla themselves. This suggests the common ancestor of these four phyla was not photosynthetic, and chloroplasts were implanted separately into each more recently. If confirmed, this polyphyly would make it desirable to treat Cryptista, Heterokonta, and Haptophyta as separate kingdoms rather than a single Chromista.

In 2009, Cavalier-Smith explained his reason for creating the kingdom: evidence that chromist chloroplasts were acquired secondarily by enslaving a red alga (a member of Plantae) and their unique membrane topology. Since then, Chromista has been defined in different ways at different times.

proposed_by
Thomas Cavalier-Smith
field
Biology
nationality
British
known_for
Controversial kingdom of eukaryotes with chlorophyll c plastids
key_groups
Stramenopiles, Haptophytes, Cryptophytes

Lore & Background

According to Cavalier-Smith, the kingdom originally consisted mostly of photosynthetic eukaryotes (algae), but he later brought many heterotrophs (protozoa) into the proposed group. Notable members include marine algae, potato blight, dinoflagellates, Paramecium, the brain parasite Toxoplasma, and the malarial parasite Plasmodium. However, Cavalier-Smith's hypothesis of chromist monophyly has been rejected by many other researchers, who consider it more likely that some chromists acquired their plastids by incorporating another chromist instead of inheriting them from a common ancestor. This is thought to have occurred repeatedly, so that the red plastids spread from one group to another. The plastids, far from characterising their hosts as belonging to a single clade, thus have a different history from their disparate hosts.

Reader's Guide

Chromista represents a significant but disputed taxonomic concept in eukaryotic classification. Its members are defined by plastids containing chlorophyll c and enclosed in four membranes, derived from red algae through secondary symbiogenesis. The kingdom's diversity is vast, ranging from algae to parasites like Plasmodium. However, molecular evidence has led many researchers to reject monophyly, suggesting instead that the plastids were acquired through serial endosymbiosis among different host lineages. This controversy highlights the complexity of eukaryotic evolution and the challenges of reconstructing ancient symbiotic events. The debate continues, with some classifications placing chromist groups within the SAR supergroup or associating them with Archaeplastida. The kingdom's legacy lies in stimulating research into secondary endosymbiosis and the evolutionary history of photosynthetic eukaryotes.

Did You Know?

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Chromista?

Chromista is a proposed biological kingdom introduced by British taxonomist Thomas Cavalier-Smith to unite eukaryotic organisms—both unicellular and multicellular—under one shared plastid architecture. It was carved out of the older Chromalveolata supergroup to spotlight a specific organelle signature common to its members.

What is Chromista's defining 'power' or key trait?

Every organism placed in this kingdom carries photosynthetic organelles (plastids) that contain chlorophyll c and are enclosed by four surrounding membranes. That four-membrane, chlorophyll-c plastid is the single structural feature that binds the group together.

Which major lineages fall under Chromista?

The kingdom is generally understood to encompass three key clades: Stramenopiles (diatoms, brown algae, oomycetes, and allies), Haptophytes (including coccolithophores), and Cryptophytes. Together they span a remarkable range of body plans, from microscopic flagellates to towering kelp forests.

Why is Chromista considered controversial?

Because it is a proposed rather than universally accepted kingdom, many systematists still prefer the broader Chromalveolata umbrella or split the included lineages along different phylogenetic lines. The four-membrane plastid criterion, while elegant, does not fully resolve all evolutionary relationships among the groups it gathers.

What is Chromista's current standing in the field?

As of the latest literature, Chromista remains a working hypothesis in eukaryotic taxonomy rather than a settled, universally ratified rank. It appears in many textbooks and research papers as a useful organizing concept, but its exact boundaries and validity continue to be debated among protistologists.

More in Algae And Protists 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →